| Sök SvenskaMagic |
 |
Sök kort:
Sök medlem:
Sök stad:
|
Sök forumet:
Sök regelterm:
Sök lek:
|
|
 jockegill
MEDLEM | MEDLEM | |
| Grundstommen i SvenskaMagic utgörs av alla våra fina medlemmar.
|
Stockholm
@svm s. 3/3 -04
87 rubriker
690 svar
|
|
|
Browbeats vara eller icke vara i standard!
10:52:43, 27/10 -06
|
|
Hej på er
Jag tänkte att vi skulle diskutera kortet i den här tråden. Jag har kommenterat en del lekar där jag klankat ner på deras val av att spela Browbeat då jag anser att kortet helt enkelt inte är bra. Jag har fått medhåll från vissa personer men mothugg från många fler.
Det var när jag läste vad Frank Karsten hade att säga om kortet som jag bildade min uppfattning. Så diskutera på nu! Är kortet spelbart eller inte i standard?
Edit: Och jag vill inte ha en massa kommenatrer som säger: "Va faaaan. Kortet är ju gryyyymt! N00bs!" En liten motivering bakom påståendet tack.
Vad Frank Karsten skrev:
"Note that I do not play Browbeat. So many people seemed to be all over it since the Time Spiral spoiler came out, but I don't like the card at all, and I want to explain in depth why you should not put this card in your decks. First of all, the effects are not as good as people would like you to believe. Would you play a card that dealt 5 damage to your opponent for three mana? Questionable. Compare this to Flames of the Blood Hand. Most Zoo decks had cut that card for more efficient burn such as Seal of Fire, since Flames of the Blood Hand could only target players and it was expensive at three mana. Flames of the Blood Hand was only playable because it could potentially deal 8 damage for three mana in response to Loxodon Hierarch. Browbeat's 5 doesn't compare well with that. Next, would you play a card that drew you three cards for three mana? In a control deck, of course. But Zoo is a lightning fast aggro deck! You would not play Compulsive Research in this deck if it were red, either. By playing card draw in a deck like this, you give up tempo and give your opponent extra time to stabilize, which is the last thing you want to happen. So neither effect is even that good for this deck. And a final argument against Browbeat, which is probably the most important one, is that you never want to give opponents control over your cards. Browbeat never does the thing you want it to do. Imagine your opponent is at three and you hope to topdeck a burn spell. Instead, you look at Browbeat, get to draw land-creature-creature and lose. There's a reason nobody played it when it was legal."
//Jocke
|
|
|
|
Loggar in...
Forumnytt
Torgetnytt
